Drug Testing In Post-Pot
Legalization America
By Dr.Fourkan Ali
As
marijuana legalization becomes more of a reality, employers are being forced to
decide between doubling down on drug policies or becoming more lenient.
Another round of U.S. states seeking to legalize and regulate
marijuanafor recreational use
is gearing up for this election day in November. They include Nevada, Arizona,
Maine, and, of course, California.
Meanwhile, employers in these states are considering just how
legalization will affect the workforce, and thus, employee drug-testing
policies. Since marijuana is still categorized as a Schedule I substance under
federal law, this presents a legal gray area for employers in states where it
has been (or will be) legalized to some degree.
“Once [marijuana] is legalized, that will protect you from
prosecution. However, it doesn’t protect your job,” according to HR expert
Edward Yost of the Society for Human Resource Management. “The one thing that’s
not clear to both employee and employer are those protections,” he told LA Weekly.
Colorado, which legalized medical marijuana in 2001 and
recreational marijuana in 2012, has demonstrated this by example. In May 2010,
a Dish Network employee named Brandon Coats tested positive for THC in a random
drug test. Though Coats is a quadriplegic and a medical marijuana patient, he
was ultimately
terminated for violating the
company’s zero-tolerance drug policy. Ultimately the case went to the Colorado
Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of Dish Network.
According to a report by Assurex Global, under Colorado off-duty
conduct laws, employees cannot be punished for engaging in lawful activities
outside of work. And since medical marijuana has been legal in Colorado since
2001, using it to treat painful muscle spasms (as Coats did) is technically a
lawful activity in the state. However, the court determined that to be afforded
this protection, employees’ activities should be “lawful” under both state and
federal law. And since cannabis is still illegal under federal law, they
decided that the Dish Network had the right to fire Coats.
This case is a good representation of the general approach that
Colorado employers have taken in a legal marijuana landscape. According to the Guardian, most lawsuits involving marijuana laws and
the workplace have ruled in favor of the employer. And according to a survey by
the Mountain States Employers Council, it seems that, at least in Colorado,
more than one in five employers are moving toward a “more stringent” approach
to employee drug testing.
It seems fairly obvious that pot legalization will lead to an
increase of positive drug tests, but the potential downside is that this could
bring up an increasing number of privacy issues for many employees, employment
attorney James Reidy told the Guardian. In Colorado, the number of positive employee drug tests for
marijuana increased by 20%between 2012 and 2013. And in that same time
period, Washington state—which also legalized marijuana for recreational use in
2012—the number of positive employee drug tests for marijuana rose by 23%,
according to Quest Diagnostics.
While some say we’d be better off doing away with employee drug testing altogether, even the FBI
is having trouble balancing federal law and the growing acceptance of
marijuana. In May 2014, FBI director James Comey “joked” that the Bureau was having trouble finding qualified hackers who wouldn’t fail a
drug test. “A lot of the nation’s top computer programmers and hacking gurus
are also fond of marijuana,” he said at the time. “I have to hire a great
workforce to compete with those cyber criminals and some of those kids want to
smoke weed on the way to the interview.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment